<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mlah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mlah.us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mlah.us</link>
	<description>The “culture” that has evolved here isn’t conducive to sissies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 03:52:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Shoplifting and Code</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2012/04/03/shoplifting-and-code/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mlah.us/2012/04/03/shoplifting-and-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 03:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mlah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/?p=1025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like it when people speak in code? Read this story about one &#8220;Tucker Max&#8221; I&#8217;m talking about when people use the word &#8220;access&#8221; Not to rag on Tucker Max any, I don&#8217;t really read him but may start. He recently tried to give half a million dollars to Planned Parenthood as both a tax dodge, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it when people speak in code?</p>
<p>Read this story about one &#8220;<a href="http://www.tuckermax.com/">Tucker Max</a>&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-1025"></span></p>
<p>I&#8217;m talking about when people use the word &#8220;access&#8221;</p>
<p>Not to rag on <a href="http://www.tuckermax.com/">Tucker Max</a> any, I don&#8217;t really read him but may start. He recently tried to give half a million dollars to Planned Parenthood as both a tax dodge, and a publicity stunt. A little effort at repairing his bad rep with the ladies at the cost of nothing to him. Give the money to PP, or to the Fed govt. Not like either needs it.</p>
<p>Ever think about shoplifting? Consider a big huge Walmart or Target Superstore. Each time somebody steals a blu-ray player, the overall operating costs of that store goes up by a little tiny amount. Well, by the price of a blu-ray player. When broken out into the overall pricing of the goods on their shelves, everything goes up by just a tiny bit. Maybe even only a fraction of a penny here and there. But the paying customers pay those prices. Ie, they&#8217;re not stealing. So some tiny fraction of each of your purchases, pretty much anywhere, is really paying for theft. YOU are buying the items that other people stole.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same with taxes. Each time someone gets a reduction, a write-off, everybody else pays a little more. (Well, if we had a balanced budget). Why do we give so many deductions? When somebody gives money to charity and then claims it on their taxes, aren&#8217;t they really deciding for me what the government funds? Shouldn&#8217;t elected officials be making those decisions?</p>
<p>I know a lot of you are thinking, what a hard nosed bastard. If we don&#8217;t let people deduct charitable contributions from their earned incomes at tax time, nobody would give to charity (except evidently me). But really, we have a budget deficit of some 1.5T$. Can we really afford ANY deductions by anybody? </p>
<p>But this post i titled &#8220;shoplifting AND code&#8221;. So on to my next point.</p>
<p>People who can&#8217;t say what they mean. Who have to speak in code. Who have to use coverterms for what they are really saying. Well, they just aren&#8217;t trying to do you any favors. When I hear people speaking in code, I automatically am suspicious of them and usually reject whatever they are selling immediately.</p>
<p>Let us talk about the word &#8220;access&#8221;. <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/access?s=t">Dictionary</a> says: &#8220;the ability, right, or permission to approach, enter, speak with, or use; admittance&#8221;</p>
<p>In the Tucker Max article, people say a lot about PP. And how women are going to have their access to reproductive services reduced, or eliminated&#8230; blah blah. That&#8217;s about where I quit listening to them and start wondering why they are speaking in code.</p>
<p>Really? Their access will be denied? They will no longer be able to near or approach to those services? Why, yes they will. They can get in their cars and drive to whichever office, service provides those services and get those same services. The only thing that really changes is who pays for them. So there is the code. &#8220;Access&#8221; equals &#8220;payment for, by others&#8221;.</p>
<p>And to expand a little, the people speaking out of the sides of their mouths CAN&#8217;T tell you what they really mean. Else it would be rejected wholesale by the public.</p>
<p>1. Don&#8217;t perform this action. This group of people would lose &#8220;access&#8221; to thing.<br />
2. Don&#8217;t perform this action. You would no longer have to pay for that action and the people receiving the benefit of that action would have to pay for it themselves, and would therefore would no longer get the benefit of that action from you for nothing.</p>
<p>Think about this way. If you want to &#8220;deny access&#8221; to movie theaters from people in wheelchairs, you do not make them pay for it. You remove the ramps and purposely put in steps everywhere. Crass I know, but it highlights the ridiculousness of the use of the word &#8220;access&#8221;.</p>
<p>When people give money away as a tax write off, it is NOT a win win win win situation. Taxpayers lose. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for charity. Be a man. Give the money away.</p>
<p>Tucker Max should have given the money away AND paid his taxes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mlah.us/2012/04/03/shoplifting-and-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voter Ids</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2012/03/18/voter-ids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mlah.us/2012/03/18/voter-ids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 04:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mlah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/?p=1023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s ridiculous the amount of voter fraud that is going on in the US. Liberals are quick to deny any evidence of any voter fraud. If you point them at James O&#8217;Keefe&#8217;s video of voter fraud in Vermont, they dismiss it. First, they will point out the James O&#8217;Keefe has in fact committed voter fraud. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ridiculous the amount of voter fraud that is going on in the US.</p>
<p><span id="more-1023"></span></p>
<p>Liberals are quick to deny any evidence of any voter fraud. If you point them at James O&#8217;Keefe&#8217;s video of voter fraud in Vermont, they dismiss it.</p>
<p>First, they will point out the James O&#8217;Keefe has in fact committed voter fraud. Even though he returned every ballot and walked away.</p>
<p>Second, they will point out that it does not prove anybody else is voting illegally. </p>
<p>Some liberals have a real concern that ID requirements would be used to suppress minority votes, but when presented with solutions like assistance to those without ID to obtain the necessary ID, they will side with ID requirements. Only those playing politics THROUGH VOTER FRAUD will continue to oppose ID requirements.</p>
<p>Check out the videos. First, O&#8217;Keefe&#8217;s video showing the ease with which anybody can perpetrate voter fraud here: </p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="375" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/PLSjL--qvsw?fs=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Here is a person who claims to have been the victim of voter fraud:</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fRa_SlbUUEs?fs=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mlah.us/2012/03/18/voter-ids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bibi makes a Point</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2012/03/06/1020/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mlah.us/2012/03/06/1020/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mlah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/?p=1020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Netanyahu gave a great speech. I don&#8217;t want another war. The last two police actions gave us too many weird restrictions already. But Bibi made his case well. What will Iran be like after they have the bomb? And even worse, what will their puppet organizations like Hamas and Hizballah be like when they realize [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netanyahu gave a great speech.</p>
<p><span id="more-1020"></span></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want another war. The last two police actions gave us too many weird restrictions already. But Bibi made his case well. What will Iran be like after they have the bomb? And even worse, what will their puppet organizations like Hamas and Hizballah be like when they realize they have the backing of a nuclear power? Talk about emboldened.</p>
<p>I hate to say it, but we probab ly need to hit Iran now. Before they have the bomb. I just hope we have the sense to do more of an invasion like we did in Afghanistan. Close air support to existing troops on the ground. But unlike Afghanistan, we need to get the hell out as soon as the Mullahs lose power.</p>
<p>Then get the hell out of the whole region.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mlah.us/2012/03/06/1020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Douglas Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2012/02/29/douglas-murray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mlah.us/2012/02/29/douglas-murray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mlah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/?p=1017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For anyone who thinks we are not going to war with Iran, Douglas Murray, a British NeoCon explains it very well. We have a choice between fighting Iran now, a Pre-Nuke Iran, or fighting Iran later on Iran&#8217;s terms, when Iran has the bomb. Check him out here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone who thinks we are not going to war with Iran, Douglas Murray, a British NeoCon explains it very well.</p>
<p><span id="more-1017"></span></p>
<p>We have a choice between fighting Iran now, a Pre-Nuke Iran, or fighting Iran later on Iran&#8217;s terms, when Iran has the bomb.</p>
<p>Check him out here</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3dBzslDdQ_g?fs=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mlah.us/2012/02/29/douglas-murray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Racist</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2012/02/27/racist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mlah.us/2012/02/27/racist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mlah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/?p=1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Obama has started the African Americans for Obama movement. Oh, I&#8217;m already seeing the uprising of people making the very obvious observation that if any of the other candidates were to start a Caucasians for Romney, Paul, Gingrich, or Santorum, that the cries of racist would be loud and long. I say do it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Obama has started the African Americans for Obama movement.</p>
<p>Oh, I&#8217;m already seeing the uprising of people making the very obvious observation that if any of the other candidates were to start a Caucasians for Romney, Paul, Gingrich, or Santorum, that the cries of racist would be loud and long.</p>
<p>I say do it. Somebody needs to. Get the ugly truth out there. Samuel Jackson has already stated that he is voting for Obama because he&#8217;s black. And with oh, between 93-97% of the black vote going for Obama in the last election, it&#8217;s easy to say that there is a LOAD of that going around.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start some white organizations. Join them. Vote white. And when the MSM starts hurling the verbal abuse around about racism. Just point at Obama.</p>
<p>We have to get this moron out of office. He&#8217;s just dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mlah.us/2012/02/27/racist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

