mlah The ďcultureĒ that has evolved here isnít conducive to sissies

March 12, 2008

Socialism is Evil

Filed under: Politics — mlah @ 4:30 am

I'm so glad the Russians are FREE!

yep. i said it. and i meant it.

socialism is evil.

there is a difference between three major philosophies. liberalism, realism, and radicalism. sure there are lots of slight flavors. lots of justifications and tweaks, but fundamentally, there are three major schools of philisophy that dominate people’s morals and outlooks on life.

Some random hot Paki girl

radicalism is the smallest. it explains the schools of thought including anarchism and communism.

realism is what guides me most often. it contains principles like the free market, and the supremity of freedom, of independance and limited government.

liberalism gives us socialism. socialism exhorts the importance of the collective, it is the anti thesis of realism. it gives us such sayings as ‘the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few’ … or the individual.

socialism has given us many things. and i’m going to be blogging them now that it is political season.

first and foremost, socialism has given us death camps. ever heard of the gulag? stalin, of the union of soviet SOCIALIST republics shipped millions of farmers and political dissidents to death camps in siberia “for the good of the people”

you see, the good of the collective outweighs the freedom of the individual to express a dissenting view from the ruling class. and mind you, all socialism was to stalin was a means of duping millions of peasants into obeying his own czarist ambitions. he promised the people everything. i’ll give everything to you that you need.

of course he took everything they had from them as well. then a circus of social workers decided who needed what. and kept the lions share for themselves. you would never have caught brezhnev in a little hovel. it was strictly dachas for him.

and if you dissented? if you dared think that you should reap the benefits of your own work? off to the gulag! don’t you realize that your work is not yours? it belongs to the people. the people need it more than you anyway.

he killed an estimated 20 million BEFORE the nazis ever invaded.

then came the nazis. the german workers national SOCIALIST party. don’t be deceived by dhimmicrats who claim the nazis were on the right because they were fascists. stalin was really a fascist too. he just lied better. he claimed to espouse communism, and favored socialist rule in the form of a dictatorship of the masses! at least until everyone was communist.

and we know that never was going to happen. end of story? stalin was dictator for life. want to know some nice words for dictators? how about caesar, kaiser, king, emperor, csar, and social worker.

you want to do what? sorry! the good of the collective demands that you not do that. do that and go to jail. do it again, and go to a death camp.

don’t believe me?

khmer rouge were socialist. so was the last ruler of somalia. you can see it live whenever hugo chaves oppresses dissent in venezuela. the chinese are running death camps right now.

it’s for the good of china!

nazis. they’re all nazis.

don’t believe the nazis were socialist? despite their own proclomations? well, proof number one. the holocaust. more? the nazis proudly proclaimed the end of unemployment! he who does not work, does not eat. — karl marx. the death camps themselves were ‘for the good of germany’. just that the nazis in all of their racial superiority blamed jews for losing wwi, and believed they needed to be vetted from the body of the nation.

but once again, it was for the good of the people. the jews just didn’t count as people to the nazis.

socialism, in its modern incarnation, is little more than a fancy tool for would be dictators to dupe the unsuspecting civilians of free societies into willingly becoming slaves.

don’t believe me. ask the experts (hitler, khomeini, stalin and mao all did this). what is the FIRST thing any dictator HAS to do upon seizing power?
take away the guns.

watch the news, just watch and see who is trying to take away the right of individuals to own weapons.

chaves is trying to do it in venezuela right now.

socisalism is evil.

14 Comments »

  1. I’m using this post to help educate my daughter! Perfect timing, m’dear.

    Comment by Da Goddess — March 13, 2008 @ 9:38 am

  2. I hate socialism, but love your pictures. Where do you find them?

    Comment by Ruck — March 13, 2008 @ 7:12 pm

  3. How wrong are you? Let me count the ways.
    –Many of our European allies are partly socialist, but not evil.
    –The US itself is part socialist! Republicans owning Congress and the Presidency didn’t get rid of Medicare or Social Security.
    –Get off it already about Hitler being Socialist. He hated Communists almost as much as he did Jews. He is not remembered for his economic policies.
    –What you call “Realism” is what most commentators call “Liberalism” (which is not to be confused w/ our contemporary liberal-conservative divide).
    –Stalin can only properly be called a “fascist” in the absolute vaguest, most ahistorical sense of the term (an all-purpose insult for a merciless goon).
    –“hugo chaves oppresses dissent in venezuela.” He also gets elected. If your issue is the oppression of dissent, there are loads of non-socialist countries doing it right now, too.
    –“donít believe the nazis were socialist? despite their own proclomations? well, proof number one. the holocaust.” You know that doesn’t make any sense, right? Holocausts aren’t caused by socialism.
    –“more? the nazis proudly proclaimed the end of unemployment!” And US presidents crow about our low unemployment!
    –“the death camps themselves were Ďfor the good of germanyí.” So if a leader says something is for the good of their country, that makes them socialist? But we do that every day!
    –“the chinese are running death camps right now.” I hadn’t heard about that. Can you tell me more? Are the Chinese still primarily socialists? Are these death camps related to their economic policies?
    –“so was the last ruler of somalia [i.e. a socialist].” What of it? What was his name and what were his misdeeds?
    –Liberalism doesn’t give us socialism; communism gave us socialism.
    –I’ve never heard Brezhnev called a mere “social worker” before!
    Da Goddess, please don’t pollute your daughter’s mind with Mlah’s idiotic blathering.

    Comment by Gus — March 14, 2008 @ 12:04 am

  4. gus, the us itself is part socialist? no shit dumbass. they’re called democrats. and they are evil.

    the republicans didn’t roll back socialism, much as all free people had hoped. but they did manage to stem the tide of of creeping socialism. both of the crap democrat wannabes tout they will enlarge social policies in the us. hell, hillary is so deperate, her speaches look like fire sales. vote for me! i’ll start a program to give you anything, everything. vote for me!

    euros are part socialist and not evil? why then was the evil empire socialist? and now they are not evil. and not socialist.† socialism is evil.

    communism gave us socialism? you poor uneducated boob. socialism is the 5th step in the human political evolution. communism is the 6th. get it right.

    Comment by mlah — March 14, 2008 @ 3:46 am

  5. Mlah, great post! There was a big shit smear on your comments page, though — you might want to wipe that off!

    Comment by Dz — March 14, 2008 @ 12:55 pm

  6. mlah: “gus, the us itself is part socialist? no shit dumbass. theyíre called democrats. and they are evil.”
    What is so evil about Dems? We haven’t killed anybody.

    “the republicans didnít roll back socialism, much as all free people had hoped.”
    They had the power to do so, but they didn’t. From this, I must conclude that they agree with welfare, medicare and social security on some level. So either these socialistic things we do are not evil or Republicans are also evil, take your pick (or maybe you’re just a spaz).

    “euros are part socialist and not evil? why then was the evil empire socialist? and now they are not evil. and not socialist. socialism is evil.”
    Huh? WTF are you trying to say here?
    Yes, most of our Euro allies are much more socialist than us and they are not evil. Is this really news to you?
    Why was the evil empire socialist? What kind of question is that? Why was the USSR socialist, is that your question? I’m sure you can find a good history of the USSR to answer that. Or did you mean something else?
    Russia is still pretty evil, though not as evil as before.

    “communism gave us socialism?”
    Yes, in the sense that people following the ideals of communism settled on socialism as a temporary state.

    Comment by Gus — March 14, 2008 @ 6:56 pm

  7. LOALOXZLOZLZOZgedfgadsf. Gus… Harry S. Truman was a Democrat. He killed plenty of Japanese people. It’s called WAR. War isn’t teddy bears and lollipops.

    Personally, I don’t think that a way of government in itself is evil, but Socialism is pretty crap. It teaches people to be lazy and not to work hard for their lifestyle. What I got from mlah is that the MORE socialist a state/entity is, the tendency of the “dude in charge” is to be immoral and evil to keep his status in any way possible.

    Boob. Hahahahaah I haven’t heard that as an insult in forever! BOOB! The thing about Chaves is ridiculous. I mean, can’t the citizens be scared into voting for him? I know the Japanese government is corrupt because the same corrupt people scare the citizens to vote in certain ways. Yakuza ring any bells? The type of people the Japanese (and perhaps the Venezuelans) are WAY different than the modern Western world. They are meek and can’t cope with change if it inflicts any pain on the public.

    Comment by Jeanna — March 18, 2008 @ 6:29 am

  8. Jeanna: “Harry S. Truman was a Democrat. He killed plenty of Japanese people. Itís called WAR. War isnít teddy bears and lollipops.”
    Really? I had no idea! Duh… Mlah’s point was that today’s Democrats are evil or totalitarian-leaning, which is bullshit.

    “What I got from mlah is that the MORE socialist a state/entity is, the tendency of the ďdude in chargeĒ is to be immoral and evil to keep his status in any way possible.”
    He proved no such thing. Socialism is alive and well in Europe w/ happy campers for citizens and free elections. Look at the history of somewhere like Central America, where socialist gov’ts– which I admit had their own problems– replaced craptacular right-wing tyrants. Don’t follow Mlah– he’s blind, too.

    “The thing about Chaves is ridiculous. I mean, canít the citizens be scared into voting for him?”
    It’s possible, but unless you can point to some evidence that it has occurred, you should probably stick to things that you know about.

    “The type of people the Japanese (and perhaps the Venezuelans) are WAY different than the modern Western world. They are meek and canít cope with change if it inflicts any pain on the public.”
    What the hell does that mean? Plenty of Americans are “meek and can’t cope” with change any better. Why are we even talking about the Japanese? They aren’t socialists.

    Comment by Gus — March 18, 2008 @ 6:50 pm

  9. But, you said the Dems didn’t kill anybody. But they did! DUH!

    I said “What I got from Mlah…” DUH!

    I didn’t try to prove anything about Chaves. I just pointed out about how he can possibly scare his voters into voting for him. I have no evidence and never claimed to have any. DUH!

    I’m comparing the type of people of Japan and Venezuela and how easily they can be swayed by fear and the public’s general way of being. If you didn’t pick that up, then DUH!

    Comment by Jeanna — March 25, 2008 @ 12:36 am

  10. oooo I found that picture on Earth Album! I tried to make it my background, but it was waay too small. Funny that I would see it here the next day though.

    Comment by Liah — March 25, 2008 @ 11:45 pm

  11. Jeanna: “I have no evidence and never claimed to have any. DUH!”
    Duh, indeed. Why the fuck say it then? That’s like saying “The moon is made of cheese, but I have no evidence for this. At the center of the earth live a race of rainbow-colored unicorns– fucking DUH!”

    “Iím comparing the type of people of Japan and Venezuela and how easily they can be swayed by fear and the publicís general way of being. If you didnít pick that up, then DUH!”
    Oh, I picked up on it alright. But again, you’re completely talking out of your ass.

    Comment by Gus — March 26, 2008 @ 12:01 am

  12. Who told you about the rainbow-colored unicorns? That’s supposed to be a government-protected secret!

    Comment by yup — March 26, 2008 @ 2:34 pm

  13. Gus, no need to use harsh language. Grow up. It’s not like you proved anything either. I just suggested reasons why someone would vote for Chaves.

    Wah wah wah. I’m a wormy dork who loves to use the f-word on the internet to seem smart and condescending.

    Comment by Jeanna — March 26, 2008 @ 3:04 pm

  14. jeanna, it is typical for gus to try and skew a debate by changing the subject. he never stays on target.

    i maintain, socialism as a system of thought is devoid of actual value. it is a feel good set of gifts designed by the would be dictators of the world to be given to the poor by those who feel guilty for their own success just so that they can feel like they did something.

    the sinisterness of the socialist agenda is unparalleled.

    Comment by mlah — March 27, 2008 @ 5:34 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress