<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mlah.us/2007/09/14/lies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mlah.us/2007/09/14/lies/</link>
	<description>The “culture” that has evolved here isn’t conducive to sissies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue,  7 Feb 2012 14:08:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2007/09/14/lies/#comment-50349</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/2007/09/14/lies/#comment-50349</guid>
		<description>Mlah: &quot;maybe you need to go back and read it. there is NOT a nuclear war in iraq. the number of people dead, or the rate at which people are dieing do not make a civil war. your, and the left’s in general efforts to label it a civil war is political gamesmanship. it is a jedi mindtrick i will not fall for.
&quot;it is NOT a nuclear war&quot;
Why the hell are you talking about &quot;nuclear&quot; anything, dipshit?
What word or phrase would you use to describe the widespread violence based on political and/or territorial and/or sectarian reasons in Iraq?  It&#039;s more than &quot;civil unrest&quot;, I know that.  Just because no one is minting alternative currency (and other things you brought up in a recent post that happened in America&#039;s Civil War) doesn&#039;t mean the term &quot;civil war&quot; isn&#039;t the best one to use.  I await your alternative terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mlah: &#8220;maybe you need to go back and read it. there is NOT a nuclear war in iraq. the number of people dead, or the rate at which people are dieing do not make a civil war. your, and the left’s in general efforts to label it a civil war is political gamesmanship. it is a jedi mindtrick i will not fall for.<br />
&#8220;it is NOT a nuclear war&#8221;<br />
Why the hell are you talking about &#8220;nuclear&#8221; anything, dipshit?<br />
What word or phrase would you use to describe the widespread violence based on political and/or territorial and/or sectarian reasons in Iraq?  It&#8217;s more than &#8220;civil unrest&#8221;, I know that.  Just because no one is minting alternative currency (and other things you brought up in a recent post that happened in America&#8217;s Civil War) doesn&#8217;t mean the term &#8220;civil war&#8221; isn&#8217;t the best one to use.  I await your alternative terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlah</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2007/09/14/lies/#comment-50105</link>
		<dc:creator>mlah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/2007/09/14/lies/#comment-50105</guid>
		<description>gus, your response to #1. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Just because it’s not identical to our own Civil War doesn’t change the fact that many Iraqis are killing each other.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

maybe you need to go back and read it. there is NOT a nuclear war in iraq. the number of people dead, or the rate at which people are dieing do not make a civil war. your, and the left&#039;s in general efforts to label it a civil war is political gamesmanship. it is a jedi mindtrick i will not fall for.

it is NOT a nuclear war</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gus, your response to #1. </p>
<blockquote><p>Just because it’s not identical to our own Civil War doesn’t change the fact that many Iraqis are killing each other.</p></blockquote>
<p>maybe you need to go back and read it. there is NOT a nuclear war in iraq. the number of people dead, or the rate at which people are dieing do not make a civil war. your, and the left&#8217;s in general efforts to label it a civil war is political gamesmanship. it is a jedi mindtrick i will not fall for.</p>
<p>it is NOT a nuclear war</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2007/09/14/lies/#comment-50077</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 02:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/2007/09/14/lies/#comment-50077</guid>
		<description>&quot;1 there is a civil war in iraq currently&quot;
As a handy shorthand to describe at least some proportion of the internal violence in Iraq, it&#039;s fine.  Just because it&#039;s not identical to our own Civil War doesn&#039;t change the fact that many Iraqis are killing each other.

&quot;2 fox news in a conservative moutpiece&quot;
Whatever, dude.  If you&#039;re so fond of it, and you&#039;re a conservative, there must be a good reason for that.

&quot;3 we did not win the war in iraq
4 we did not win the war in afghanistan&quot;
We booted Saddam and the Taliban as gov&#039;ts, hooray!  But we are fighting major counter-insurgencies and both new central gov&#039;ts are weak, with no end in sight.

&quot;5 bush lied, people died&quot;
He did, they did, and they keep on dying.

&quot;6 saddam hussein had nothing to do with alqaida, or 9-11&quot;
Oh, jeezus.  
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein_and_al-Qaeda
&quot;The consensus of intelligence experts has been that these contacts never led to an operational relationship, and that consensus is backed up by reports from the independent 9/11 Commission, declassified Defense Department reports[3] as well as by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence...&quot;

&quot;7 iraq is a quamire&quot;
Why not?  
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/quagmire
&quot;1.	an area of miry or boggy ground whose surface yields under the tread; a bog.
2.	a situation from which extrication is very difficult: a quagmire of financial indebtedness.&quot;
Our efforts haven&#039;t got much traction there so far, and getting out will, indeed, be difficult.  When do you see peace arriving there?

&quot;8 bush is stupid&quot;
Certainly our least articulate modern president, and certainly unwise in many of his policies and appointments.

&quot;9 bush is a sinister mastermind bringing about the end of democracy&quot;
I&#039;ve never believed that.  He has had some funny ideas about the Constitution sometimes, though.

&quot;10 hillary is a moderate&quot;
She is not wildly out of touch with the beliefs of any thinking American.  I&#039;m a Kucinich fan myself-- she is not as cool as him in our eyes.

&quot;11 obama is interesting&quot;
Who said that was his selling point?  He&#039;s smart as hell and pretty cool, but no, not terrifically interesting.  But so what?  He&#039;s at least as interesting as any of the major candidates from either party.

&quot;12 it’s time for a change&quot;
And a change is gonna come!  The 2004 election was just a small sign of the changes yet to come.  The Repubs can&#039;t agree on a candidate and that&#039;s gonna hurt you.

&quot;13 bushco started the war in iraq to steal their oil&quot;
I never really believed that, either, per se, but part of the plan was at least to open up their oil fields to private investment, including US companies.

&quot;14  we torture prisoners in gtmo&quot;
Obviously it depends on your definition of torture.

&quot;15 the cia has secret prisons&quot;
True, but that&#039;s just because they have been closed down.

&quot;16 the republicans are trying to bring back the draft to fight their wars of imperialism&quot;
I&#039;ve never once heard that from a Dem or liberal.  Rangel (D-NY) was the only person I&#039;ve heard suggesting a draft, and he did that only as a rhetorical device.

&quot;17 healthcare should be free&quot;
We could save a lot of money and extend benefits to more people with a single-payer system.  Most people would still have to pay into it.

&quot;18 bush stole the election&quot;
It was fishy.

&quot;19 bush is/was trying to stack the supreme court to reverse roe v wade&quot;
Of course.  He had to pay back the evangelical vote somehow.

&quot;20 islam is a religion of peace&quot;
http://www.juancole.com/2006/03/peace-and-love-in-quran-list-of.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;1 there is a civil war in iraq currently&#8221;<br />
As a handy shorthand to describe at least some proportion of the internal violence in Iraq, it&#8217;s fine.  Just because it&#8217;s not identical to our own Civil War doesn&#8217;t change the fact that many Iraqis are killing each other.</p>
<p>&#8220;2 fox news in a conservative moutpiece&#8221;<br />
Whatever, dude.  If you&#8217;re so fond of it, and you&#8217;re a conservative, there must be a good reason for that.</p>
<p>&#8220;3 we did not win the war in iraq<br />
4 we did not win the war in afghanistan&#8221;<br />
We booted Saddam and the Taliban as gov&#8217;ts, hooray!  But we are fighting major counter-insurgencies and both new central gov&#8217;ts are weak, with no end in sight.</p>
<p>&#8220;5 bush lied, people died&#8221;<br />
He did, they did, and they keep on dying.</p>
<p>&#8220;6 saddam hussein had nothing to do with alqaida, or 9-11&#8243;<br />
Oh, jeezus.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein_and_al-Qaeda" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein_and_al-Qaeda</a><br />
&#8220;The consensus of intelligence experts has been that these contacts never led to an operational relationship, and that consensus is backed up by reports from the independent 9/11 Commission, declassified Defense Department reports[3] as well as by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;7 iraq is a quamire&#8221;<br />
Why not?<br />
<a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/quagmire" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/quagmire</a><br />
&#8220;1.	an area of miry or boggy ground whose surface yields under the tread; a bog.<br />
2.	a situation from which extrication is very difficult: a quagmire of financial indebtedness.&#8221;<br />
Our efforts haven&#8217;t got much traction there so far, and getting out will, indeed, be difficult.  When do you see peace arriving there?</p>
<p>&#8220;8 bush is stupid&#8221;<br />
Certainly our least articulate modern president, and certainly unwise in many of his policies and appointments.</p>
<p>&#8220;9 bush is a sinister mastermind bringing about the end of democracy&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;ve never believed that.  He has had some funny ideas about the Constitution sometimes, though.</p>
<p>&#8220;10 hillary is a moderate&#8221;<br />
She is not wildly out of touch with the beliefs of any thinking American.  I&#8217;m a Kucinich fan myself&#8211; she is not as cool as him in our eyes.</p>
<p>&#8220;11 obama is interesting&#8221;<br />
Who said that was his selling point?  He&#8217;s smart as hell and pretty cool, but no, not terrifically interesting.  But so what?  He&#8217;s at least as interesting as any of the major candidates from either party.</p>
<p>&#8220;12 it’s time for a change&#8221;<br />
And a change is gonna come!  The 2004 election was just a small sign of the changes yet to come.  The Repubs can&#8217;t agree on a candidate and that&#8217;s gonna hurt you.</p>
<p>&#8220;13 bushco started the war in iraq to steal their oil&#8221;<br />
I never really believed that, either, per se, but part of the plan was at least to open up their oil fields to private investment, including US companies.</p>
<p>&#8220;14  we torture prisoners in gtmo&#8221;<br />
Obviously it depends on your definition of torture.</p>
<p>&#8220;15 the cia has secret prisons&#8221;<br />
True, but that&#8217;s just because they have been closed down.</p>
<p>&#8220;16 the republicans are trying to bring back the draft to fight their wars of imperialism&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;ve never once heard that from a Dem or liberal.  Rangel (D-NY) was the only person I&#8217;ve heard suggesting a draft, and he did that only as a rhetorical device.</p>
<p>&#8220;17 healthcare should be free&#8221;<br />
We could save a lot of money and extend benefits to more people with a single-payer system.  Most people would still have to pay into it.</p>
<p>&#8220;18 bush stole the election&#8221;<br />
It was fishy.</p>
<p>&#8220;19 bush is/was trying to stack the supreme court to reverse roe v wade&#8221;<br />
Of course.  He had to pay back the evangelical vote somehow.</p>
<p>&#8220;20 islam is a religion of peace&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.juancole.com/2006/03/peace-and-love-in-quran-list-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.juancole.com/2006/03/peace-and-love-in-quran-list-of.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

