mlah The “culture” that has evolved here isn’t conducive to sissies

June 7, 2006

Creeping Sharia

Filed under: Politics,Religion — mlah @ 12:00 am

mogadishu has fallen.

sharia law is creeping out of the middle east and expanding its reach to new territory.

first, they hit sudan. i like the way it’s vogue right now for hollywood to whine about the massacres in darfur. muslims in authority killing the non-majority muslims. they killed the christians in their south not too long ago. did hollywood say anything about that? it’s also popular for muslim men to kidnap christian women, and force them to convert to islam, and marry them (one of four wives) and then notify her family of the marriage.

then eritrea breaks away from ethiopia. the ancient biblical land of kush which actually gave safe harbour to mohamed when he was being persecuted. pretty much the same atrocities.

now mogadishu is in the hands of islam, and sharia law is being instituted. women not veiled in public are subject to execution. and with the capital, and major city now under muslim control, individual tribes in the countryside will soon fall under attack. soone all of somalia will be under the yoke of sharia.

where next? people are guessing nigeria. the northern half (roughly) of nigeria is muslim. chad maybe?

be careful. sharia law is already being instituted in various parts of the uk and canada.

25 Comments »

  1. Maybe Sharia will will land in California so that Clooney and the other loonies can say they are on the fore-front of the ubiquitous murders of repressed and subjugated women.

    You know where hollywood and the other leftist, socialist pseudo-intellectuals have been for every murder/terrorist act/genocide perpetrated in other countries by non-americans, mlah?

    The same place they are at when a cop gets shot, or innocents are killed in a DWI accident, or an elderly person misses the brake thereby mowing down several pedestrians in Washington Square Park, or when children are raped or killed or beaten by so-called loved-ones (or total strangers), the list is endless.

    They are at the beauty salons, or on sets being directed as to how to behave and what to say, in their cozy expensive homes by the ocean, or, if they are not in the “business”, they are on college campuses masquarading as learned souls, or in cheap digs coming up with ways to continue to tear apart this country because they have absolutely nothing better to do and they think their view of the world is how it should be. You never hear these people come out for reforms in education (other than revisionist), or child-abuse laws, or anything!

    It’s sad that priorities in this country only really include destroying the president based on hatred, dismanteling anything that maintains stability and structure, and making excuses for the very people (terrorists, radicals)who commit the heinous crimes again all who refuse to convert or succumb to their whims.

    Amazing.

    Comment by Welsh Witch — June 7, 2006 @ 1:41 pm

  2. What does this have to do with Hollywood, or liberals more generally? Welsh Witch, you are one whacked-out chick.

    Comment by trick_shot_f-in_cheny — June 7, 2006 @ 11:55 pm

  3. Actually, “they” have alot to do with all of this since “they” have made it quite clear that “they” will use their status and any podium to get people to think “their” way. Just refer back to everything that Clooney, Sarandon, Robbins, Penn, Moore, etc. etc. have said (particularly of interest is Clooney’s rambling at the Oscars). They have no problem supporting an anti-government agenda, but miss all the little things that happen every day in this country that, to me, are more important to contend with on a local level.

    Oh, and thank you for the compliment.

    Comment by Welsh Witch — June 8, 2006 @ 8:27 am

  4. “They have no problem supporting an anti-government agenda, but miss all the little things that happen every day in this country that, to me, are more important to contend with on a local level.”

    Since when is Mogadishu, the subject of this post, “local” to Americans?

    “The same place they are at when a cop gets shot, or innocents are killed in a DWI accident, or an elderly person misses the brake thereby mowing down several pedestrians in Washington Square Park, or when children are raped or killed or beaten by so-called loved-ones (or total strangers), the list is endless.”

    Where do you get your cracked-out ideas that liberals (in Hollywood or elsewhere) don’t care about cops getting killed, DWI accidents, senile drivers, abused kids, etc? You’re totally nutso, lady!

    Comment by trick_shot_f-in_cheney — June 8, 2006 @ 6:40 pm

  5. So basically, everything in Team America: World Police is true? Mmkay, that’ll work.

    Comment by medium john — June 8, 2006 @ 9:24 pm

  6. no, gussie boy, this post was not about mogadishu. read it again. this post was about creeping sharia, just like the title says.

    and mogadishu has relevance to local america when i mention muslim attempts at instituting sharia law on western soil

    Comment by mlah — June 8, 2006 @ 11:19 pm

  7. I know it was about creeping sharia– in Mogadishu, not locally! Or is someone trying to institute sharia in Hollywood?
    Both of your attempts to somehow connect this to liberals/Hollywood are truly pathetic.

    Comment by trick_shot_f-in_cheny — June 9, 2006 @ 9:15 pm

  8. Creep is a verb as well as a noun gussie. that may be a new concept for you having only heard it as a noun before. but using it as a verb implies that it moves, so you statement that i was talking about it in mogadishu….. no!

    it’s creeping man, it’s mobile. it worldwide. just not succeeding everywhere yet.

    do you really think it’s in hollywood? interesting! i’ll have to think about that.

    Comment by mlah — June 9, 2006 @ 11:04 pm

  9. I don’t need English lessons from a retard, retard.

    This has never had anything to do with Hollywood/liberals– you and that WW beyotch were the ones who somehow dragged those notions in (they didn’t creep in by themselves, creep!).

    This turn of events is all W’s fault, anyway, since he was too much of a pussy to risk another Black Hawk Down scenario:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1794391,00.html

    “It has emerged that the Bush administration bankrolled the warlords, who are secular, to gain access to al-Qaida suspects and block the rise of the Islamic militia. CIA operatives based in Nairobi funnelled $100,000 to $150,000 (£80,000) a month to their proxies, according to John Prendergast, an International Crisis Group expert on Somalia who has interviewed warlords. ‘This was counter-terrorism on the cheap. This is a backwater place that nobody really wants to get involved in, so [they] thought, let’s just do this and maybe we’ll get lucky.’

    “US diplomats in Nairobi who criticised the warlord payments as shortsighted were ignored and, in one case, reassigned to another country. The State Department, which favoured a wider policy of nation-building, was trumped by the CIA and the Pentagon, which wanted results fast.”

    Comment by trick_shot_f-in_cheny — June 10, 2006 @ 2:09 am

  10. It’s all W’s fault. It will ever be W’s fault. W is the epitome of evil, and all things evil stem from W. So saith Gus, saith the Left.

    Had W sent tropps into Somalia, W would be hung in effigy (yet again) for selling US blood for Somali oil. Er, Somali gold. No? Er, whatever is valuable in Somalia. Anything W does is subject to criticism ad nauseum from the Left. Gus — the fat-assed computer jockey who went from University studies to work for NY State government at a desk job, has so much machismo that he can call W a pussy for not committing troops to counter-terrorist operations inside Somalia. The $100k figure he spouts, if true, would be so much cheaper than actually placing boots on the ground (and avoids risking US troops) that it’s laughable that Liberals like Gus decry it.

    Comment by yup — June 10, 2006 @ 10:07 am

  11. Disturbing, this does not bode well for future, and I REALLY do not want to go back to that shit-hole.

    Comment by Crusty — June 10, 2006 @ 9:57 pm

  12. “Had W sent tropps into Somalia, W would be hung in effigy”
    W has never given a fig about criticism, so that surely can’t be what stopped him.
    I have thusfar evaded the malignancy common among my IT peers of Chair Ass, may Allah be praised. You’re a pussy too, Yup.

    Comment by trick_shot_f-in_cheney — June 13, 2006 @ 1:41 am

  13. if w has never cared about criticism, why did he take the photo op way back on thanksgiving in iraq? hmmmmm? i think i remember you talking about hat.

    contradicting yourself are you?

    Comment by mlah — June 13, 2006 @ 5:47 pm

  14. “contradicting yourself are you?”
    I don’t follow you. You point is about W in Iraq for Thanksgiving is…?

    W himself, when most of the world was protesting the Iraq invasion, said that he never took criticism to heart.

    Comment by trick_shot_f-in_cheney — June 13, 2006 @ 7:55 pm

  15. nice attempt at dodging bucko. taking to heart and caring about criticism arew two different things.

    Comment by mlah — June 13, 2006 @ 8:15 pm

  16. Okay when you mean “most of the world” is that actually France, Germany, Russia and China – you’re mentioning? Because I know a lot of nations actually sent their troops to Iraq.

    For your sake, I hope Sharia Law is never enforced here because something tells me that they also don’t enjoy people disagreeing with their government’s actions.

    —————-

    About Somalia – my brother whose going back to Iraq on his third tour said that before OIF I that Somalia was being heavily looked at for a possible invasion.

    If we’re meant to go back, we will. The UN won’t do anything plus we have a ‘large’ force in the region already.

    Comment by Jen — June 14, 2006 @ 12:29 am

  17. Gus, you classify me a pussy just as you do George W Bush? Wow, I am honored! Of course, I never called you that, just fat-assed and a dhimmi. You claim you don’t have Chair Ass. But my friends at NSA hijacked your webcam and tell me otherwise.

    Comment by yup — June 14, 2006 @ 2:12 pm

  18. Jen: “Okay when you mean “most of the world” is that actually France, Germany, Russia and China – you’re mentioning? Because I know a lot of nations actually sent their troops to Iraq”
    No, slut, I mean the actual people of the world, citizens as opposed to their governments, who protested the Iraq invasion in massive numbers.
    Are you equally aware of all the countries who have since pulled out their troops? Like, half the countries of the Coalition of the Bribed.

    “For your sake, I hope Sharia Law is never enforced here because something tells me that they also don’t enjoy people disagreeing with their government’s actions.”
    None of us would do well under sharia, would we? Yup showing a disconcerting amount of interest in my ass and all the rest of it. If you seriously think that could ever happen here, you are nuts.

    Comment by trick_shot_f-in_cheney — June 14, 2006 @ 7:44 pm

  19. So Gus, you simply ignore the European courts when they grant Muslim men rights according to their religious beliefs, despite those rights being against European law? Such as the right to beat your wife to death, rape women with impunity for being out alone, unaccompanied, and in immodest clothing (or for simply being born a western whore)? You don’t see any of that getting into our legal system in the US? What about our famous SCOTUS liberals who tell us we have to take foreign legal standards into consideration when we apply our own laws? Hmmmm. Nope, none of that would ever happen in the US. Nope, Never.

    Dhimmi.

    Comment by yup — June 15, 2006 @ 12:55 am

  20. No, I don’t.
    Can you point me to info on the ones you refer to in Europe?

    Comment by trick_shot_f-n_cheney — June 15, 2006 @ 8:03 pm

  21. Albania is full of them Gus. so is european turkey.

    but acknowledging the context, look to norway, where norwegian women were cited for their insensitivity to their new immigrants bu not wearing headscarves. and were more than 50 % of the rapes are being commited by muslim immigrants against christian indiginous women. and mind you muslims constitute around 2-3 % of the population.

    oh, and they were gang rapes.

    and norwegian women are at fault for not wearing headscarves?

    Comment by mlah — June 15, 2006 @ 11:10 pm

  22. No, I said “point me to info”.

    Comment by trick_shot_f-in_cheny — June 16, 2006 @ 10:13 pm

  23. Just do a friggin’ google search, man.

    Comment by Dz — June 21, 2006 @ 8:50 pm

  24. Gus, some light reading for you.

    Here is a link describing how Australian police forces are being told to disregard wife beating when it’s done by a Muslim man.

    There’s also this link describing how British authorities are considering legalization of polygamy for Muslims.

    Here is an example of how Muslims are being given preferential treatment above other religions in Australia.

    This one describes the high incidence of Muslim men raping Western girls.

    Comment by yup — June 27, 2006 @ 3:31 pm

  25. Gus, really this page is better for a wide-angle view of the raping phenomena.

    Comment by yup — June 27, 2006 @ 3:35 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress