mlah The “culture” that has evolved here isn’t conducive to sissies

April 26, 2005


Filed under: Religion — mlah @ 9:35 pm

'The Sword of Islam

western colonialism.

i expect of youngsters who have not been to college, or traveled much to rely on the meagre history taught in public school.

but for a college student, or a student of the world, i expect them to be able to look past the facade of the myth of western evil.

i see this same belief in the ‘simple’ manifest itself normally in one of two ways.

first, they will either blame the papacy for the majority of evils in the world.

sinead o’connor took this view when she was spitting on a picture of the pope, while on live tv.

'Some random crusader pic

poor simpleton. she needs to get out more if she is afraid to read. it’s actually a racist belief to ascribe the majority of evil to the papacy.

i’ll explain in a second.

secondly, they will blame not the pope, but western imperialism in some form. they will either decry colonialism or agressive wars as a uniquely western abhoration. you don’t see anyone else doing it do you?

poor, poor, simpletons.

again this is racist.

you see my friends. for the vast majority of recorded history, ‘the west’, or ‘white men’ have been but a mere footnote. to lay the majority of the worlds ‘evils’ somehow at the popes feet is to dismiss non-white history as inconsequential in the same breath.

don’t believe me? the population density in the orient vastly outstripped western population throughout history. only in the 19th century did europe begin to have anything even remotely like the number of persons in the far east. and up ’til 4-500 years ago there were no white men in the orient, save marco polo and the huns. and the huns were pagan at the time.

how did the pope have ANY influence in slaughters perepetrated by the mongols in fujian? how did he spur them on?

central america. cortes described tenochtitlan as rivaling venice in beauty, and beating it in population. cortes ‘discovered’ the meshica in very early 1500s.

how did the pope influence the sacrifice of 20,000 souls at the founding of the chief temple in the aztec capitol pre cortes?

let’s talk about the arabs. even better. let’s talk about jihad. muslims have never colonized anyone? come on, simpleton.

mohammed led the arabs out of the arabian peninsula. you know, ARABIA? anywhere else bear that name? nope.

when london was just a little muddy wooden fort called Lin’s Dun, and got burnt by caesar, damascus had public lighting on their city streets. but it wasn’t the arabs. ancient syrians were an armenian people. conquered and colonized. most people think damascus was built by the arabs.

syria was taken away from the byzantine empire in a war of agression. not launched by the greeks either.

egypt? the word comes from the name of the ancient people who set it up. they were called copts. and they are STILL there. they just got colonized by the arabs after being conquered in a war of agression.

north africa? ever hear of the barbary coast? or the barbary pirates? conquered by arabs. and colonized. the ‘berbers’ are still there. they’ve been pushed into these little enclaves of territory. kind of like reservations.

spain, conquered. colonized too. but then came the reconquista. and notice the RE-conquista. they were conquered first in a war of agression launched by Tariq. his landing spot in spain still bears his name. it is commonly called the narrow mountain way of tariq, or in arabic, mudayiq jibl altariq. after a few hundred years of non arabic speakers mispronouning it, Gibraltar.

india. heard of the skandaguptas? yeah, i didn’t think so.

taj mahal in delhi? means place of the tiara in arabic. conquered! and colonized. pakistan should be part of india. it is just muslim india.

dagestan, the duchy oif kiev, the ancient kingdom of kush, which gave succour to mohammed in his hour of need. conquered. colonized. the comorros? the balkans (by turk muslims, not arabs),

and this is JUST islam. only some 1465 years.

but the west has somehow in the last 500 years eclipsed everyone else! racist bastard. wake up to the world.

history is DOMINATED by non western, non-white peoples.

'Saudi Flag with the sword of Islam

genghis khan had the opportunity of invading europe or the mideast. he laughed at europe because there were no spoils there. he crushed baghdad instead.

timur the lame, or tamerlane, as we tend to call him in the west tried to kill every single georgian after he conquered them. they were only christian afterall.
did they start the war? conquered, and after refusal to convert…..

tamerlane wrote mehmet of the blooming ottoman empire a note dividing the middle east, ‘as there was no reason for muslims to fight each other when there were infidels at hand’.

jihad is not agressive. bullshit.

still don’t beleive me?

take a good look ate the saudi arabian flag. the flag of the keeper fo the holy cities of islam. all that scribble says the muslim proclamation of faith.

there is only one God, and mohammed is his prophet.

but then look under it. plain for everyone to see is the sword of islam.

and we are being colonized now.


  1. I think you just confused the poor kids. They don’t know these historical details. Knowing these things would require them to go to a library and read.

    Comment by Steve Adams — April 27, 2005 @ 12:23 am

  2. Blahblahblah. Thanks, Perfesser, for the history lesson! Now go back to where I said “the past couple centuries”. How have things looked solely during that time? Anyway, I never said or implied that aggressive wars and colonialism were stricly Western vices. I only meant to neutralize your charge of Islam being pure evil with the West’s own evil, which is undeniable. Maybe someone somewhere has made an estimate of the number of people murdered for Allah vs. for Jesus, that would be a funny statistic to see!

    “To the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen” –The Bible
    Exclusive? Check. Expansionist? Check. Violent? Check.

    Racist and condescending? Check. French champion of colonialism, Jules Harmand in 1910 said:
    “‘It is necessary, then, to accept as a principle and point of departure the fact that there is a hierarchy of races and civilizations, and that we belong to the superior race and civilization, still recognizing that, while superiority confers rights, it imposes strict obligations in return. The basic legitimation of conquest over native peoples is the conviction of our superiority, not merely our mechanical, economic, and military superiority, but our moral superiority. Our dignity rests on that quality, and it underlies our right to direct the rest of humanity. Material power is nothing but a means to an end.'”

    As to Sinead, here’s her side of the story:
    She wasn’t blaming the Pope as a man, but as the stand-in for the Roman Catholic Church; and she wasn’t blaming it for “the majority of evil in the world”, but for its historical effects on her country of Ireland, where its monopoly impossible to escape. I don’t think she is afraid to read or travel. You’re just blaming her for things she didn’t say or imply.

    What the hell does your final comment “We are being colonized now” mean? Care to expand on that? I recently read that in not too many years, 1 in 4 Americans will be Hispanic– that’s the only colonization going on here.

    Comment by f-in_cheney — April 27, 2005 @ 1:43 am

  3. yes, the french are condescending and racist.

    siniead made her side of the story very apparent o n natl tv. what you’re citing is spin. i understood her perfectly.

    Comment by mlah — April 27, 2005 @ 7:05 pm

  4. F-in Gus, man are you nearsighted. Only you and your ilk could be so full of hate for your own white ancestors that you blame all modern evils on them. You, Gus, are entirely responsible for the evils of slavery. Oh wait, that wasn’t started by white men. You Gus are entirely responsible for the evils of colonization. Oh wait, that wasn’t started by white men. You Gus are entirely responsible for Michael Moore. Well, check, there’s one in your column for hate the white (squishy liberal non-thinking dunderhead) man.

    As for my ancestors, they were proudly taking yours as slaves (and raping your women) back in the days before “civilization” took away their history.

    Comment by yup — April 27, 2005 @ 8:15 pm

  5. Yup, what are you talking about? Come back down to earth, you’ll llike it here.

    Comment by f-in_cheney — April 28, 2005 @ 1:04 am

  6. Things just haven’t been the same since I spit on Hanoi Jane…..

    Comment by yup — May 2, 2005 @ 8:02 pm

  7. eh?

    Comment by f-in_cheney — May 2, 2005 @ 11:45 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress