<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mlah.us/2004/04/26/abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mlah.us/2004/04/26/abortion/</link>
	<description>The “culture” that has evolved here isn’t conducive to sissies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed,  8 Feb 2012 14:18:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlah</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2004/04/26/abortion/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>mlah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 06:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/?p=53#comment-212</guid>
		<description>it was mike farrell
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was mike farrell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2004/04/26/abortion/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2004 00:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/?p=53#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Dude, McLean Stevenson died on February 16, 1996. I doubt that you saw him on TV at a rally in 2004. Maybe on a MASH re-run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, McLean Stevenson died on February 16, 1996. I doubt that you saw him on TV at a rally in 2004. Maybe on a MASH re-run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yup</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2004/04/26/abortion/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>yup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 01:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/?p=53#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I have tried to debate this topic civilly with coworkers (the nation&#039;s best and brightest, or so they claim). All I get for trying to understand their point of view is a big lecture about how abortions were advertised in newspapers around the 13 colonies, and were not made illegal until mean old Queen Victoria came along (say, wasn&#039;t she a woman) with all her nasty, brutish morals (hey lady, give me back my whiskey!). And how women (womyn?) were forced to go to back-alley clinics for a rusty clothes hangar treatment. (Now how many of those REALLY occurred? Anyone got a true, factual answer, or would I just receive a lot of knee-jerk flames?) 

Thing is, all of this pretty much took place before I was born (well, before I was able to spell refridgerator). It&#039;s ancient history to me. I don&#039;t care about what people of a previous generation couldn&#039;t do; the situation has been fixed, the genie is out of the bottle, and (as with the repeal of Prohibition) will bever come back again. Just don&#039;t make me participate in your abortions, ladies, that&#039;s all I ask. You can have all you want. 

Now as for the men not having any &#039;choice&#039; here -- for the past several decades, women (womyn?) have been demanding that men become all sissified and in touch with their feelings. Well, many of us have complied with those demands, and as felling people, in touch with our inner selves, we feel that we deserve to be consulted on an issue that has ramifications for our persons. (And I speak as the father of a 3-month old; my peson doesn&#039;t particularly enjoy waking up at 3 am to rock her back to sleep, but it&#039;s my job, eh. And I pray that my country doesn&#039;t enable her to take any medical treatments [which includes abortion and RU-486] without my knowledge until she&#039;s legally able to enter a binding contract.)

Ta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried to debate this topic civilly with coworkers (the nation&#8217;s best and brightest, or so they claim). All I get for trying to understand their point of view is a big lecture about how abortions were advertised in newspapers around the 13 colonies, and were not made illegal until mean old Queen Victoria came along (say, wasn&#8217;t she a woman) with all her nasty, brutish morals (hey lady, give me back my whiskey!). And how women (womyn?) were forced to go to back-alley clinics for a rusty clothes hangar treatment. (Now how many of those REALLY occurred? Anyone got a true, factual answer, or would I just receive a lot of knee-jerk flames?) </p>
<p>Thing is, all of this pretty much took place before I was born (well, before I was able to spell refridgerator). It&#8217;s ancient history to me. I don&#8217;t care about what people of a previous generation couldn&#8217;t do; the situation has been fixed, the genie is out of the bottle, and (as with the repeal of Prohibition) will bever come back again. Just don&#8217;t make me participate in your abortions, ladies, that&#8217;s all I ask. You can have all you want. </p>
<p>Now as for the men not having any &#8216;choice&#8217; here &#8212; for the past several decades, women (womyn?) have been demanding that men become all sissified and in touch with their feelings. Well, many of us have complied with those demands, and as felling people, in touch with our inner selves, we feel that we deserve to be consulted on an issue that has ramifications for our persons. (And I speak as the father of a 3-month old; my peson doesn&#8217;t particularly enjoy waking up at 3 am to rock her back to sleep, but it&#8217;s my job, eh. And I pray that my country doesn&#8217;t enable her to take any medical treatments [which includes abortion and RU-486] without my knowledge until she&#8217;s legally able to enter a binding contract.)</p>
<p>Ta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: draygon</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2004/04/26/abortion/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>draygon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/?p=53#comment-209</guid>
		<description>First of all, I have to agree with mlah about some of the mean speech on display during the march. I read Gloria Steinem&#039;s gem that &quot;This government is the greatest danger on earth.&quot; Lose it, I say, that b.s. helps the cause not a bit. For the Pro-Choice movement to hold its ground, the argument has to stay focused on the same thing Roe v. Wade did: the right to privacy.

I remember in the 2000 Bush-McCain debate in S.C., Bush and McCain were pressed by Larry King and back-of-the-pack Alan Keyes to reconcile their Pro-Life stances with their comments not to involve their families in the debate. Both refused, saying it was &quot;personal&quot;, &quot;family&quot; matter. To me, that stance lies at the heart of the Pro-Choice movement and Bush and McCain at that debate unwittingly endorsed it. They cannot have the luxury of saying they are Pro-Life but keep a private family exemption for themselves.

Is abortion wrong? Of course it is, and every woman I know who has had one is haunted by that decision. If the situation arose, I would beg and plead with my girlfriend not to do it, but in the end it comes down to one thing: it&#039;s her life and her body, and not my place to tell her what to do with it.

M.Butterfly: I would be curious to know where you stand on parental notification laws. If I were a daddy, I would want to know what my minor daughter had done and hopefully have a chance to counsel her about it.

thx mlah for the soapbox, and no I don&#039;t think you&#039;re a simpleton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I have to agree with mlah about some of the mean speech on display during the march. I read Gloria Steinem&#8217;s gem that &#8220;This government is the greatest danger on earth.&#8221; Lose it, I say, that b.s. helps the cause not a bit. For the Pro-Choice movement to hold its ground, the argument has to stay focused on the same thing Roe v. Wade did: the right to privacy.</p>
<p>I remember in the 2000 Bush-McCain debate in S.C., Bush and McCain were pressed by Larry King and back-of-the-pack Alan Keyes to reconcile their Pro-Life stances with their comments not to involve their families in the debate. Both refused, saying it was &#8220;personal&#8221;, &#8220;family&#8221; matter. To me, that stance lies at the heart of the Pro-Choice movement and Bush and McCain at that debate unwittingly endorsed it. They cannot have the luxury of saying they are Pro-Life but keep a private family exemption for themselves.</p>
<p>Is abortion wrong? Of course it is, and every woman I know who has had one is haunted by that decision. If the situation arose, I would beg and plead with my girlfriend not to do it, but in the end it comes down to one thing: it&#8217;s her life and her body, and not my place to tell her what to do with it.</p>
<p>M.Butterfly: I would be curious to know where you stand on parental notification laws. If I were a daddy, I would want to know what my minor daughter had done and hopefully have a chance to counsel her about it.</p>
<p>thx mlah for the soapbox, and no I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re a simpleton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madame Butterfly</title>
		<link>http://www.mlah.us/2004/04/26/abortion/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Madame Butterfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mlah.us/?p=53#comment-208</guid>
		<description>There are so many issues related to abortion.  Science, religion, life, death...

No one has the right answer.  I don&#039;t think no one ever will. 

But for every man who gets mad at not having a choice, how many did have a choice, and didn&#039;t make the right one to begin with?  As long as that problem exists, so will abortion.

I&#039;d rather see it legal and controlled, rather than go back to the dark ages before Roe v. Wade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many issues related to abortion.  Science, religion, life, death&#8230;</p>
<p>No one has the right answer.  I don&#8217;t think no one ever will. </p>
<p>But for every man who gets mad at not having a choice, how many did have a choice, and didn&#8217;t make the right one to begin with?  As long as that problem exists, so will abortion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d rather see it legal and controlled, rather than go back to the dark ages before Roe v. Wade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

